Aresposito55's picture

could you please call me sometime to talk about this. AFternoon to evening and weekends are good, just not to early as I am handicaped and got to get my self going. Also, do you know about the group that they are going to do on habeas corpus.?

lawman2's picture

Hi April. I take it you are new to the NLA website? If so, please navigate to the top of the page and go to the section titled "Free Courses". When you hover your mouse over that link, you will see several menu options. You will want to begin your education here at NLA by completing this free U.S. Constitution course. Afterwards, I would highly recommend you take the free Civics course. 
When you have completed both courses, you may want to go to the "Education" taba t the top of the screen, and choose the "Judicial" menu. From there you can access several useful resources in helping you understand how courtroom rules and procedures are conducted. Finally, you can reach outr to any of the leadership members at NLA, and they may be able to offer more specific recommendations regarding your son's prison sentence, and what you can do to assist him.
I hope that is helpful to you. 

Romona's picture

Recently I was charged with a Feloney (Tampering with a witness) which I did not know about until I received a letter from a bonds man requesting to go my bond. I called him and told him I didn't have a warrant and had done notthing to break the law. He told me to go online at closenet.com and I would see that I had charges and a warrant. I did, and to my surprise , he was right. I called the sheriff and he said he had not gotten around to arresting me and to go to the police and turn myself in and post a $4900.00 bond. I told him I was not guilty of a crime and had very little money and he said I would have to go to jail for 23 + days until my court date. When I asked about a Jury and due process he got upset and said " Look lady I am just doing my Job". I told him he was not doing his job and then had to go post bond. I have been unable to even function with this pending and the way the law is operating here.  I am not guilty of a crime, the state took the police report and file charges of Tampering when all I did was ask a "Friend" to please drop the charges against my niece. She told the law I threatened her and all I did was warn her that drugs were responsible for all of hers and my nieces problems and I was going to do something about all the drugs.  I did not threaten her about not dropping the charges. Now I am guilty until I prove that I am innocent. This will cost more money and could cost me my rights and freedom. I am considering filing papers concerning jurisdiction but I am afraid, because the law is not following the law. Just thought I would share this to get it off my chest.

Ron Flick's picture

See COS Flyer 2 - Under the COS Tab and fist drop down - regarding the Second Militia Clause that DIRECTLY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY DEMANDS THAT 57 MILLION MALES UPHOLD THE LAW OF THE LAND!  There are roughly 57 million males between the ages of 17-45. Only 7.3% of the total population have served in the military (23,000,000) of which 10% are females.  Many of these ex military are over 45.  Roughly 2,300,000 females have served in the military. So, the vast majority of the 17-45 aged males who make up the Unaffiliated Militia - many of whom hunt in the forest, target shoot, own guns for self defense, or collect guns, and many not even even owning a gun have never read or studied the Constitution. Therefore, many,if not MOST have no clue as to THEIR Constitutional duties under the Militia Clauses of the several states.    This is a gross neglect of our representative government – the Oath Takers.  We have a problem Houston.  The Constitution is not working because our Representatives are not following the Four Militia Clauses of the Several states and the law of the Land.  Our Public School System and Department of Education is failing the nation in teaching the Constitution.   Clearly We the People have to start somewhere to correct this problem and the most direct route is the Second Duty of the Militia: to protect against enemies DOMESTIC.  The 57 million males between 17-45 need to get a course in the Constitution under their belt if we are to save the nation from the destructive path it is currently on. Just 34 pages and 30 days to learn it, and We, the People could enforce a major detour in this train wreck.  Please address any of the following parties to invite to your COS presentation: persons that might be members of a shooting club itself, a gun club, pawnshop owners, gun collectors, a patriot group. They might be members of a survivors group, a search and rescue group, a field medical group, a volunteer fireman’s unit. They might be HAM radio operators, ex-military intelligence, ex special forces, veterans of foreign wars. They might be retired military, policemen, SWAT team members, and/or belong to Oath Keepers.  They might be your neighbor, your father, your brother, your friend, your son, your husband, your doctor, dentist, auto mechanic and dry cleaner guy.  All of them might be between the ages of 17-45 so they need to be at your COS presentation. Set a Date, Reserve a room at the library where a projector is already there and just plug into it and show the COS video. Make up a Flyer with the Contact data on it ...the date, location (draw a map) and time of meeting with your name and phone number on it and staple it together with the COS Flyer 2 and start with the above fellows and Getter Done. Take a yellow marker and highlight the entire Second Duty of the Militia paragraph.  Need more input on the urgency...  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5E6LLbzQMYl6-6ntSjJ5nw     


Rhode Island Jim's picture

I brought this up at a Monday night meeting nearly one month or more ago, and it was discussed, agreed upon by all who were engaged in the conversation, but to my knowledge, this has never happened. My question is why not? Everyone appeared to think it was a good idea.

americanmister's picture

How can I get some. I tried to order but it is sold out is there a way to backorder

Jan@NLA's picture

we are currently sold out, and have not placed another order yet. You can go here and download a copy. https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/Grand%20Jury%20Hand%20Book%20Final.pdf

Jefferson-A.I.T-MO's picture

Hello everyone our new NlA chatroom system is up and running  ,when logged in it will be located bottom Right corner of screen ,then scroll list for PUBLIC CHATROOM .. OR you can pm message another member directly just click on their profile name ,,Spread the word  ..westill need more communication if we are to reach CRITCCAL MASS...vEry pleased to see this communication line opened up so we can chat with eah other from state to state.Information and Education should flow  well .And great for New members to ask questions as well .WE hope to see you come by and visit this onsite chatroom and get to know your neighbor states.I have been seeing a few people come and go in chatroom but we need more people to come in and start communicating as the people.Once again its agreat place to come and get any questions one might have answered.

jkwilborn's picture

Hello, I have unwittingly damaged the Blue Ray disk that I keep all the sites agreements. I don't seem to be able to find or down load them here...

Is there a link for these kinds of questions?

BTW If you want donation, don't give them the option of $60 ($5 X 12) or a $20 one time shot. Let them give what they wish to donate.

I get repeated emails, "Donate 5 bucks", which is not true, there is no $5 option (only with the 'monthly' option.) Going to donate $10 bucks but you won't take it, so you don't need it very much. You won't see any monies from me with this setup and I don't know how much money you have lost from others, that feel as I do, that didn't take the time to tell you.

Ron Flick's picture

In a world of Paypal and Visa, Checks and Cash are still king. I have used the latter from day one.....the last 33 months and never missed a month. If you really want to donate to the cause, simply mail your check or Money Order to:

National Liberty Alliance
3979 Albany Post Road, Suite 107
Hyde Park, New York, 12538
Fax - 888-891-8977

rls4979's picture

Is there any way to email somebody, anybody for help? I have searched and searched. I am taking the Constitutional course. I just started and doing the introduction, question 3...The word “unalienable” means incapable of being alienated; that is, ____ and ___________. (Separate words by space)

My answer sold transferred that is exactly what it says...UNALIENABLE RIGHTS – The word “unalienable” is synonymous with inalienable which means incapable of being alienated; that is, sold and transferred. [Black’s 4th]

But for some reason I get it wrong and I cannot advance until I get it right. I came here wanting to learn more but all I did was frustrated!

Tully's picture

same here , the 17th (The laws of nature are _______  ) question is eather "common" or "unalienable" or " Gods " but it never registers to be correct and has hung up my progess for 6 months and has not been corrected. I've read through the 7 pages many time and taken the test over and over and 17 is always wrong. This test should be set up in a way where if you get 2 wrong it will show you which ones are wrong and then show the right answer next to it. If someone gets 3 or more wrong then they need to take it over. 
I'm sure this quiz could have tought me a bunch of cool stuff but when you know an answer is right and it still doesn't allow you to pass, well forget it. Its not worth the frustration. I'll just move on and learn about our Constitution from someplace else. 
They probable dont even know how many people come in here and start on the quiz and never finish it because of this kind of thing.

Jan@NLA's picture

I assume you mean question 10. The answer is given in the firt paragraph of page 4. Unfortunately all of your choices are incorrect.


George Pringle IV's picture

I am stuck on Chapter 11, Question 1. I have already spoken to Ron Flick on the Phone and he assured me that my answer is correct. My answer is: sureties peace surties peace    I have played with it, spacing it differently and tried everything I could think of but every time I get it wrong and cannot advance. Plese help me with this issue.

mrbagobeans's picture

This matter was talked about on Monday's show. The courses have been made easier to accomplish and if you still have troule then you need to email to Kathleen@nationallibertyalliance.org and explain your predicament. I've found her to be a godsend to completing the courses.

Sagji@aol.com's picture

i am still on chpt 8 trial by jury can't advance bc i cannot get an answer from kathleen. does anybody know why? my answers are; 1 free administration 2 rents 3 had reason 4 natural right 5 peacefully 6 accomplice 7 proportion 8 voluntary 9 groundless 10 malice 11 lawlessness thanks again anyone at this point

KathyNYPutnam's picture

If you send me an email, I will respond.  I did not get an email from you.  Make sure you send it to Kathleen@NationalLibertyAlliance.org    I respond many times a day, and every day.    Kathleen

pkhileman's picture

I can not access the civics course. Am signed in. There are only 2 places to click. One for updating the years of experience and the other is quizzes. When I click on the here for the years experience it says I am not allowed access. Can I get some help? Thanks.

grizzlyhopehugger's picture

Q: Is there an app that can be downloaded that will allow me to access the material that requires flash, such as the civics course audio?

A: Yes. You should be able to downloading Puffin, Dolphin, or Photon Browser through playstore for free and then open nationallibertyalliance.org through it. I've had the most success with Puffin for both my tablet and android cell phone which do not support flash.

Here is a link that maybe helpful for ipad devices:

God bless!

ML wilson's picture

I have been feeling stuck for a few months, not having Flash and therefore unable to access the civics courses, but that all changed today when I saw the message by grizzlyhopehugger about using Puffin as a browser, I loaded Puffin onto my IPhone 3 from the app store and now I am a happy camper working on the civics course. Thank you Grizzly!

grizzlyhopehugger's picture

Anytime we can help each other it is such a blessing! I'm glad I could share the info. that also helped me, as the civics course is vital to us all learning how to save our Country.

KathyNYPutnam's picture

Thank you!   I will add this information to the "Before you Begin the Quiz" page, so others can know!

Fourth Branch's picture

It maybe better not to argue any traveling infraction on the specifics of the case. Doing is to acknowledge the Nisi Prius Court has jurisdiction over you. Object on the grounds a Nisi Prius Court does not have jurisdiction over you since you are one of the People subject only to Common Law jurisdiction and entitled to due process of law per Amendments V, VI and VII in the Bill Of Rights. Make it clear you do not give consent for the hearing to proceed under Statute Law.

Additionally cite the fact using the roads for personal, not commercial purposes, is to engage in traveling and that traveling is an unalienable right not subject to Statutes. There are many Federal Court opinions affirming this claim. They include but are not limited to Thompson v Smith, 154 SE 579, Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293, State v. Johnson, 245 P 1073, Kent v. Dulles 357 U.S. 116, 125, SHAPIRO v. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) 394 U.S. 618, Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, CANTWELL v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, 310 U.S. 296 (1940) 310 U.S, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491, Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262, Murdock v Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 105, Miller v. U.S. 230 F 486 at 489, Sherar vs. Cullen 481 F 2D 946, (1973),

You can also cite Federal Statute 18 U.S. Code § 31(a) confirming using the road for personal reasons is not subject to Statue Law since you are not operating a motor vehicle as it is defined in the following: (6) - “The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.” Many State Statutes have similar language.

The issue can also be raised a speeding ticket is an Appearance Ticket that does not confer jurisdiction over a defendant. The following cases buttress this claim:

[People v. Gabbay, 670 N.Y.S.2d 962, 175 Misc.2d 421 678 N.Y.S.2d 26,92 N.Y.2d 879, 700 N.E.2d 564 (1997)] "Appearance ticket is not accusatory instrument and its filing does not confer jurisdiction over defendant."

[People v. Giusti, 673 N.Y.S.2d 824, 176 Misc.2d 377 (1998)
"Service of an appearance ticket on an accused does not confer personal or subject matter jurisdiction upon a criminal court."

[U.S. v. Beckford, 966 F.Supp. 1415 (1997)] "Only Congress can make an act a crime, affix punishment to it, and declare court that shall have jurisdiction."

Any traffic ticket is a Bill of Attainder and an ex post facto Law. A Bill of Attainder is a legislative Act that finds a person guilty and imposes a punishment without a trial or conviction. A Bill of Attainder is unconstitutional per Article I Section IX Clause III and Article I Section X Clause I of the U.S. Constitution. An ex post facto law makes illegal an act that was legal (traveling) when the act was committed, increases the penalty of an alleged infraction after the alleged infraction was committed or changes the rules of evidence to make a conviction easier. Traveling, being an unalienable right, is legal but the ticket is attempting to make it illegal. Sometimes a District Attorney will inform the accused just before the hearing the penalty will increase should the accused challenge the ticket and lose thereby increasing the penalty after the alleged infraction was committed. The rules of evidence are changed by the mere fact no evidence can exist against a person who is using the roads solely for personal purposes and not for commercial purposes.

Bradley Amendment's picture

DO the courts have to refund the BOND for alleged speeding tickets, once the alleged defendant shows up to court!  The officer did not sign my ticket and nor did I, and I motioned for appeal! They held me in the county jail, until I paid the BOND.  I used case law and the CONSTITUTIONAL OATH that officers are bound by as the JUDGE made a statement, that the city of COLUMBUS, GEORGIA is a consoldiated government and officers do not have to follow the law! 

Liberty Now's picture

That's a great post! Thank you for taking the time to put it here.

grizzlyhopehugger's picture

Q: What type of government do we have? Obama, politicians, media, websites etc. continue to provide misinformation to this very important question. We are definitely in the age of deception and asleep at the wheel.

A: We are a Republic. What exactly does this mean?

A Republican government is one in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. [In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627. Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626]. Ruled by Law. Limiting the government. Property Rights=Freedom!

See the 9th and 10th Amendments to see additional limitations on what Congress can and can't do;, as everything is limited to Constitutionality. For any law that comes in conflict with the Constitution is null and void of law, it bares no power to enforce, no obligation to obey, purports to settle as if it never existed. For unconstitutionality dates from the date of enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law. No courts are bound to uphold it. It operates as a fiction of law. Article 6 Paragraph 2 and supported by the Supreme Court decision in Marbury v Madison Vol. 5 US Pg. 137 (1803 ).

Q: What is a democracy?

A: That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 388; Bond v. U.S. SCOTUS] recognizes personal sovereignty, June 16, 2011. Ruled by the majority without limits. Rights (Freedom and opportunity) are traded for false damaging security.

In fact Democracy is not mentioned one time in the Constitution and our forefathers warned against having a democracy, saying history has repeatedly shown that it is the most dangerous form of government and never lasts long before it turns into an oligarchy. A debate took place, a Republic form of government was chosen to protect the sovereign people's inalienable rights by limiting the government, and an iron clad contract was made in writing that stands in all courts and cannot be broken.

Q: What is an oligarchy?

A: It is the most common government in history and today in which a group rules (e.g., Ancient Greeks,, Rome, Germany- Hiltler, Russia, Obama, etc.) and will create chaos to take total control. Tyranny of the elite that soon becomes an oligarchy with a monopolistic State controlled system which has ownership of the capital. It`s the idea that rights are privileges. Sounding familiar? History repeating itself.

Q: How do we correctly interpret the words used in the Constitution?

A: The words used in Black`s Dictionary, 2nd edition as cited above, are the words used when the Constitution was signed and the definitions within are enforceable by law! Also see Am. Jurisprudence Vol. 16 Sec. 97 which tells judges how the Constitution is to be interpreted; it's supposed to be interpreted in favor of us, the clearly expressed and designated beneficiary`s. It is supposed to be liberally enforced to protect the rights/property of the citizens.

Gain understanding on our Constitution before it's too late. If you don't know your rights you have none. We must be willing to defend them as so many brave individuals have sacrificed their lives throughout history to give us freedom! Freedom is not free and the burden lies on us to defend our rights by first educating ourselves. The info above was derived from the https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm and the free Civics Course available on this site!

God Bless! Jesus is my hero!

Bradley Amendment's picture


grizzlyhopehugger's picture

Q: Do we have privileges or rights?

A: One of the fundamental problems in America is that the government has convinced us that we have certain privileges granted to us by the government.

The Truth is, we have been endowed with inalienable rights that we don't have to get permission for. Privileges can be revoked at anytime. We the people grant the government privileges; the powers come from us and go to the government. Not the other way around!

All rights are derived from property. Any dispute as to who has the right to do this, that or the other thing can be solved by answering."Who owns the property?" If you own the property, you can do whatever you want, but you must first know your rights and then assert them in a timely manner.

You cannot grant someone a right! Privileges, on the other hand are generally identified by a permit or a license in which you enter a hidden contract.

Q: How do I learn more about my rights?

A: The bottom line is that we all need to read and fully understand the Constitution. It is the Supreme Law of the land, it is in writing, is still standing, and enforceable in any court of law.

Multiple Supreme Court cases support our rights and we need to learn these cases to use them effectively in our arguments.

Q: What are some examples of case law etc. which can be used when I claim my inalienable rights?

A: Marbury v Madison and Article 6 , paragraph 2 of our Constitution provide strong arguments because the truth is that anything that is in conflict with the Constitution is null and void of law, it bears no power to enforce, no obligation to obey, purports to settle as if it never existed. For the unconstitutionality dates from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law. Basically, no courts are bound to uphold it, no citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a mere nullity or a fiction of law.

Furthermore, Murdock v Penn says that, No states may convert a secured liberty into a privilege and issue a permit/license and fee for it, and require you to have it.

Shuttlesworth v Birmingham Alabama says If the state does convert your right into a privilege, issue a license/permit and fee for it, and require you to have it, you can ignore the license/permit and fee and engage in the right with impunity.

The 9th amendment says, Congress has no authority to add onto the Constitution in such a way that it would take away rights previously guaranteed and no authority to pass laws that are in conflict with the Constitution.

Am Jurisprudence Vol 16 Sec 97 tells the judge how the Constitution is to be interpreted and it is in favor of the clearly intended, specifically designated beneficiary, which is interpreted in favor of we the people.

Title 5 US Code Sec 556D is clear and specific in saying if you are denied due process of the law that all jurisdiction ceases automatically and there are Supreme Court cases to support this right that was intentionally included within the Bill of Rights!

Black`s Law Dictionary, pre- 3rd edition, can clear up any misinterpretations. New editions have purposely taken common law out.

Q: What is the punishment when a public servant violates his/her oath?

A: Individuals hiding under the fiction of law (statutes/codes) under unlawful corporations are guilty and punishable by death, as stated in Title 18-treason! We work under the principles of justice and mercy; public servants are given an opportunity to repent and change their ways. Remedy is integral to receiving justice for damages done.

We will all stand on judgment day before the one true King, Jesus Christ and account for the way we lived. God bless all those who are seeking Truth and do not have blinders on. As for the wicked, they shall perish. Psalms 1

Q: What are the references for the above info?

A: I want to reference and give a big thank you to Michael Badnarik & Carl Miller for each of their Constitution Classes, NationalLibertyAlliance.org for sharing the information, supporting, and taking action, and Jesus Christ for making these Truths known!

God bless! Wake up America, we must defend our Liberties together in a unified front now, before it's too late!

Bradley Amendment's picture


grizzlyhopehugger's picture

Click on the frowny face on the right side of the page, select the appropriate option that best fits your circumstances, and follow the instructions. Someone will get back with you, as indicated in the instructions.

Please get involved, as it will take each one of us to save our country!

lennie65's picture

I am a new member and am very interested in doing whatever it takes to bring the legal system and the "government" back in line with the organic Constitution . I have been reading the material provided in the jurist section as well as watching the videos . I find the sheer volume of information amazingly informative and hope I can learn to retain as much of it as humanly possible . I am currently going over the information a number of times in order to retain it . I am convinced we're on the right track and that it can be done , however , I haven't listened to a live discussion yet because , as I have said , I just recently joined and have been studying the information available here . A week and a half to be precise . I am a bit concerned by not seeing much information or responses posted to the current date , 5/31/2015 . If anyone could comment or give any clarification as to why this is , I would appreciate it . I live in Florida if that makes a difference .

grizzlyhopehugger's picture

Q: How do I help to bring the legal system and the "government" back in line with the organic Constitution?

A: We have several committees to join, listed under the Committee Tab. If interested, please contact the director of the committee you are interested in. We truly need participation from everyone at whatever capacity they can give.

Also you can take the Free Civics Course by clicking on the Civics Course Tab at the top of the page to continue educating yourself.

Saving America starts with each one of us taking the very steps you are taking now. We look forward to working with you!!!

John57's picture

Go to Media Tab Upper left , see court filing click on it to see the most recent action taken 5/29 /15 - 5 in May many before.

Ron Flick's picture

Under the Table of Contents could be sub-files regarding subject matter and then at those listings, under that subject matter the actual Tab Category, the Sub heading and the document you wished to locate spelled out there in the NLA Table of Contents. It could probably best follow THE PROCESS John and Gerard is always discussing....or it could follow some sort of train of thought starting with basics of Common Law and some definitions. It could begin with Jurist Orientation....and Tabs one might find such things under. It might follow the items one might find under the Headings at the top of the page and the sub- categories under each and what sort of topics are covered there, in addition to similar subjects closely related that might be found under other tabs and list like-subjects that might apply. This Table of Contents would "cut to the chase" and reduce the present frustration we all have trying to locate subject matter on this huge website.

FAQ should have a Glossary of terms, phrases and words we all use.
Example: A while back NLA was pushing the "3 cent postage" to help the states to afford what they couldn't do for lack of funding. If a new person coming in to NLA wanted to locate such data, they wouldn't know where to look. But if you had a Glossary of terms, which had referenced items, like "3 cents postage" that said See Jurist Tab- Jurist Documents - see list. This would cut out a whole bunch of redundant discussions, which is the basis for FAQ, is it not? Suppose you read an article on MMS and you didn't know what it meant. John D. mentioned it on a call last week. To find out if NLA discussed such things, you could turn to the NLA Glossary and see what it says: See Media tab -Today's issues - G. Edward Griffin. watch first two videos at top of page. Or you wanted to find the Duty of the Sheriff document that was listed in the NLA Glossary....where it said See Welcome Tab - scroll down page - look in right hand margin. Just saying.

This is what I would like to see on this website, and isn't there now and is very frustrating trying to find such things. The paper read last night on the Judges referenced the "Preamble to the Bill of Rights". If one wanted to read this where would then begin to look?? There is no place to look now, so they waste John's time or someone else's or their own looking for something that should already be there. See my point? Both the Table of Contents and the Glossary could be an open-ended project to accommodate the NLA moving target.

Ron Flick
DC #12 - Iowa, Missouri and Arkansas

grizzlyhopehugger's picture

Hello Ron,

Thank you for your comment and sharing your ideas. It was a pleasure speaking with you today. A glossary is a great idea and should be a very helpful resource!!! God bless!

Q: How will the FAQ page be structured when up and running?

A: It will be laid out in the traditional FAQ format, as I am doing now. We will be working on structuring the page in a way that allows people to find answers to their questions quickly. Additionally the page will periodically be renovated to make improvements as we go, taking suggestions into account.

Ruble's picture

How to write and file an Administrative Claim against a judge? And do you have any example to follow?

grizzlyhopehugger's picture

Q: How to write and file an Administrative Claim against a judge? And do you have any example to follow?

A: Click on the Media Tab, as well as the Essays/Lectures Tab under the Menu to research filings, etc.

Askari's picture

Where can I find the letter to the Sheriff at?

garyd's picture

Click "Court Filing" under the "Media" tab in the menu bar and scroll down to "Mandamus_to_sheriff.pdf"

rosanbala's picture

Thanks Jefferson. I missed the chat box and I thought I did what you said..... My comment though, If I can make it comprehensible...and all due respect and is there is much deserved to Gerard and John and Jack ("common Law" conference friday..."we all" got in an oddly outrageous uproar over something about this....seemed that way to me/ "you can lead horse to water but you can't make him drink....." ) Was it Gerard on last night's call?? said something about some of us "participants" Shooting ourselves in the foot..and that could be etc and also I might be using out of context; I've heard that from other "superiors" at a time when I saw it as a controlling judgment by people who were "framing" me or invalidating my judgment /...who would disclaim there was any trespass of my rights and no accountability of observing rule of law or civility in their behaviors....(like a railroading) not to get too insulting I feel that critical in our social system that participants can be too readily denied thought and is so habitual any protest is treated as disruptive and "know it all;" the agencies or Leaders find themselves bereft of thinking followers and have shot themselves in the foot.???. for us who dare to respect our freedom of will we find ourselves ostracized and maybe in jail. that's at the core of Common law ?????

Jefferson-A.I.T-MO's picture

Missouri Conference chat fri night 8pm -10 pm in the real time chat room just click on mon night call top left on home page and scroll down page and log into real time chatroom.>>Kelly State coordinator