HERE IS ONE EXPLANATION FORMA CONCERNED NLA MEMBER REGARDING OUR QUO WARRANTO RESPONSE FROM THE FEDERAL JUDGE IN MISSOURI Have We A Plan For Response
I AM's picture
"A review of the document for compliance with Administrative Directive 14"
It is my understanding that Common Law is not subject to rules, regulations, statutes etc., and in this case Administrative Directive 14 (rule).
"This document fails to contain a caption which properly identifies this Court"
It is my understanding a caption does not control the body of the document, however the document clearly states in its TITLE/CAPTION,
"WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO
SERVED VIA UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TO: United States Supreme Court : Judges and all Federal District Judges:
FILED VIA UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE IN: US Supreme Court & All United States District Courts:".
Common sense (common law) shows to which courts the document is directed via it's TITLE/CAPTION.
Their response is titled MEMORANDUM yet the body issues an order. So which is it?
cap•tion (kăp′shən)
n.
1. A title, short explanation, or description accompanying an illustration or a photograph.
2. A series of words superimposed on the bottom of television or motion picture frames that communicate dialogue to the hearing-impaired or translate foreign dialogue.
3. A title or heading, as of a document or article.
4. Law The heading of a pleading or other document that identifies the parties, court, term, and number of the action.
"Further the document attempts to abrogate laws"........ "and create a status which exempts the signer from normal operation of the law".
It is my understanding that any so called laws that were created by corporate USA are null and void from a common law standing. Referring to codes rules regulations statutes etc. as law is an out right deception.
"As such, the documents are a nullity and without legal effect."
This is true, they have no legal effect! Because they are LAWFUL documents, not legal (in fiction). Big difference in the two words.
This response is an attempt to side step the law via their fictions of law which were created to do exactly that, side step the law.
By mailing the QUO WARRANTO back they committed mail fraud under their own rules which apply to them, the bureaucrats, not the People.
Please do not take my word for any of this, do the research yourself and come to your own understanding.
Best to you all!
