Here is my DRAFT of my Action for DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF based on Administrative /Common-Law Judgment (previouysly shared) --- go to: https://discord.com/assets/325421cb49d6e0717b8c7b9dfa2d4bdc.svg
Here is my DRAFT of my Action for DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF based on Administrative /Common-Law Judgment (previouysly shared) --- go to: https://discord.com/assets/325421cb49d6e0717b8c7b9dfa2d4bdc.svg
larrylynndavis2020@gmail.com
your link does not work I do want your paperwork here is my email
larrylynndavis2020@gmail.com
This has been corrected.
Jan
And REMEMBER ... you can always COPY /PASTE an email address into your Email app ...
IT HAS A CASE NUMBER !!! Leaming, et al. v. Sampson, et al. --- district court of the United States, western district of Washington: 2:23-cv-00333-RAJ --- CLAIM(s) FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF /REMEDY(s) AND FOR AGREED PUNITIVE DAMAGES ON REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE (Common-Law) RECORD ... and they're stuck - limited to the FACTS appearing in the ADMINISTRATIVE (Common-Law) Record & JUDGMENT !!! The complete Administrative /Common-Law Record & JUDGMENT is entered as EXHIBIT !!! NO EXCEPTIONS TO 2ND AMENDMENT, ETC., email Infamous Keny ( infamous.keny.01@gmail.com ) for copies of process !!!
District Court Clerk REFUSED to issue SUMMONS - Now using NOTICE OF SUIT, REQUEST WAIVER OF SUMMMONS procedure;
I was 'in the hospital' (VA-Seattle) when they got the NOTICE /WAIVER --- the Patient Experience Director came to my room asking 'WHAT ARE WE SUPPOSED TO DO WITH THIS' ... I suggested "Get COMPETENT Counsel" --- after further discussion, he said 'we'll send it to legal' and slithered out of the room ... (my 'police escort' had already dissapeared!)
The very Judge who, years ago, provided 'curative instruction' in Orders Dismissing cases - 'FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES', and now retired (Senior Status) Chief Judge Coughenour, when seeing a comprehensive Administrative Record purports to not be able to see any 'Facts' in the Administrative Record, and dismisses the action - NOW 'HOVERING' IN THE 9TH CIRCUIT - they can't seem to figure out what to do with an Appeal requiring them to determine if the elderly 'Senior Judge' has Dimentia or other elderly brain disease, since it is OBVIOUS he's now 'talking out of the other side of his mouth' and Ruling DIRECTLY CONTRARY to his previous Rulings /Orders !!!