JUDICIAL Disability as a petition for a redress of grievances 28 U.S.C. § 351 & 28 U.S.C. § 353 This judge is of bad behavior, below is how the judge was of bad behavior.
THE COURT WATCHERS FORM AND QUESTIONNAIRE COMPLAINT FORM AGAINST JUDICIAL OFFICER
I hereby request an investigation of Judge __________________ Court in county, _______________, ___________State. On information and belief, I state that the above-named judge: Witness Name________________________ Date:_____________
They are not voidable, but simply VOID, AND THIS IS EVEN PRIOR TO REVERSAL.” [Emphasis added]. Vallely v. Northern Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348, 41 S. Ct. 116 (1920). See also Old Wayne Mut. I. Assoc. v. McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 S.Ct. 236 (1907); Williamson v. Berry Nevertheless, a void judgment may be challenged at any time, even collaterally. Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of Education, 201 Ill. 2d 95, 103 (2002).
A void order may be challenged in any court, at any time, and even by third parties.
•______1. Was there a grand jury indictment to force you to answer?
•______2. Was there a trial by jury? •If there is no jury, it is automatic impeachment of the judge. Turn the tables , you are here to impeach the judge, those who are aiding & abetting the judge also.
•______3. The Judge is subject to Supreme Law and has violated the persons rights under the Supremacy Clause appears in Article VI of the United States Constitution
•______4. Has practiced law from the bench. The judge must be of GOOD behavior and a high crime or a misdemeanor will remove that judge from the bench and practicing law from the bench is a high misdemeanor. When the judge says that a point of law applies, that is practicing law, his only job is to referee.
•______5. Failure to Ensure Rights; Due process, right to counsel; right to trial for fine over $20. Enacting a writ of attainder is illegal, you must be duly convicted by a jury to be fined.
•______6. If your are damaged in any way, you must receive just compensation.
•______7. Has engaged in unethical and improper conduct as a judge. Demeanor, Decorum (Includes Inappropriate Humor) including ordering an self represented person to “get an attorney.”
•______8. Partiality, bias, or prejudice (against an individual or group)(Includes Embroilment, Prejudgment, Favoritism) INCLUDING In Pro Per, Religious, Gender, Race, Disability & Indigent.
•_____ 9. Ex-parte (one-sided) communication with one or some, but not all parties or attorneys. Including refusing to listen to a Pro Se or Pro Per party.
•_____10. Conflict of interest / failure to disqualify: On-bench Abuse of Authority in Performance of a public servant.
•_____11. Gifts/loans/favors Ticket-fixing, including refusing to charge fellow civil servants for crimes they have committed, is giving of a favor or ticket fixing.
•_____12. Administrative Malfeasance (Includes Conflicts Between Judges, Failure To Supervise Staff, Delay in Responding to Complaints about Commissioners.)
•_____13. Decisional Delay, Tardiness, Attendance.
•_____14. Sexual Harassment/ Inappropriate Workplace Gender Comments, Lack of Candor /Cooperation with Regulatory Authorities
•_____15. Has willfully or persistently failed to perform an official duty by;
•____a. Delay (includes delay in setting a matter for hearing or deciding a case)
•____b. Injudicious temperament (includes failure to be patient, dignified, and courteous or by exhibiting rude or intimidating conduct)
•____c. Abuse of judicial power (includes a knowing or persistent disregard of clear law or fundamental rights)
• ____d. Legal error / improper procedure
•____e. Failure to perform duties of office. Judicial Duties of up holding the Constitution. •____f. Failure to review evidence in a case.
•_____16. Has engaged in gross personal misconduct. Misconduct (off the bench) (includes prohibited charitable, business, personal, political or criminal conduct) Non-substance Abuse Criminal Conduct.)
•_____17. Has used intoxicating beverages or dangerous drugs in such a way as to interfere with the proper performance of official duties. •____18. Has a Physical or mental disability that impairs the proper performance of official duties.
•____19. Was there denial to the courtroom, to: ________________________ •____20. Was there a "injured party" present in court?
•____21. Was either party denied the opportunity to cross-examine a witness?
•____22. Was untimely attempt to introduce testimony from Child Protective Services, Mediation, the other party?
•____23. Was there attempt at improper service of papers or notice of the appearance of witnesses.
•____24. Was there proof of service of the court date, and all evidence and witnesses present? .
•____25. Was Exculpatory Evidence ignored? (Did you have proof that nothing happened?)
28 USC Sec. 453. Oaths of justices and judges Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: ``I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.''
The Supremacy Clause appears in Article VI of the United States Constitution. It establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. treaties as "the supreme law of the land." The Constitution is the highest form of law in the American legal system. State judges are required to uphold it, even if state laws or Constitutions conflict with it.
Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or PROPERTY, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
Article III Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during GOOD behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--
The trial of all crimes, except in cases of IMPEACHMENT, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.
Section. 9. No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or TITLE, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by JURY shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
If your attorney is calling themselves Esquire, it is a TITLE OF NOBILITY, or the judge has the title of Honor! Black's Law Dictionary (Sixth Edition) has the following under the definition of "Esquire" "In English law, a title of dignity next above gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to sheriffs, sergeants [sic], and barristers at law, justices of the peace, and others. In United States, title commonly appended after name of attorney: e.g., John J. Jones, Esq." We have a RIGHT to Confront our accuser, to cross examine them and to have a defense and COUNSEL for our defense. To be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. Puckett v. Cox & Gideon v. Wainwright
http://www.caught.net/prose/immunity.htm
TITLE 28 § 1442 Federal officers or agencies sued or prosecuted (1)The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, sued in an official or individual capacity for any act under color of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue.
TITLE 15 § 1122 Liability of United States and States, and instrumentality and officials thereof (a) Waiver of all sovereign immunity by the United States.
TITLE 28 § 454 Practice of law by justices and judges; Any justice or judge appointed under the authority of the United States who engages in the practice of law is guilty of a HIGH MISDEMEANOR.
Aiding and Abetting the lower courts.
A Greylord offence. U.S. Vs. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th. Cir. 1985), 31 Judges were removed from the bench after a Federal Court Ordered an investigation, it was confirmed aiding & abetting from the inferior Courts to the Federal Court, violations at every level.
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Article. II. Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
TITLE 28 § 455. Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances: (1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding; (2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/11/washington/11fbi.html
F.B.I. to concentrate on public corruption now includes more than 2,000 investigations under way. "We have traditionally had the independence to investigate corruption regardless of political affiliation and no matter how powerful the official is," he said.
ARTICLE III, SECTION 3, CLAUSE 1 Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them (We the PEOPLE are Them), or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on CONFESSION IN OPEN COURT. The THEM is “WE THE PEOPLE” The war on we the people in these courts, by these illegal judges must END. We are NOT doing anything new.
We must prevent these things being done, by either congresses or courts — The people — THE PEOPLE — are the rightful masters of both Congresses, and courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it —“ Abraham Lincoln, [September 16-17, 1859
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.“ John Basil Barnhill
You cannot ask the government to police it’s self when it is no longer obeying the law. You must restore the rule of law, personally, by education and then by enforcement of the information you have learned.
The gold fringe flag, makes the court room a pirate ship, and you being called to answer before a pirate.
18 USC § 1661. Robbery ashore Whoever, being engaged in ANY piratical cruise or enterprise, or being of the crew of ANY piratical vessel, lands from such vessel and commits robbery on shore, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.
US CONSTITUTION Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.
These are the questions that President Clinton was indicted on. This inquests of impeachment;
(1) Yes No Did the judge commit perjury;
(2) Yes No Did the judge obstruct justice;
(3) Yes No Did the judge, tamper with witnesses; and
(4) Yes No Did the judge obstruct a jury.
(5) Yes No Did the judge, abuse the power of his office.
(6) Yes No Did the judges policy or custom cause the deprivation of rights.
A judge is not above the law. He is only a person of good behavior, and if he is not, then he is not a judge. If you do not know what the judge is doing then he gets away with tyranny. Time to end the tyranny.
I'm going to copy this form and use it at court tomorrow. Whats the best way to get a copy. and how and what do I need to do to be a courtwatcher.
Keep it simple is all I ask..
WHERE IS THE GRAND JURY INDICTMENT FORCING ME TO ANSWER?
1. am I a public servant?
2. Is there a jury present?
3. What public servant am I being called forth to impeach today?
4. Are you practicing law from the bench?
5. You are impeached for the high misdemeanor for practicing law from the bench.
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/court-watching-form
http://www.thecourtwatcher.com/Fired-2015-1343.doc
http://www.thecourtwatcher.com/Fired-2015-Judge.doc
http://www.thecourtwatcher.com/fired2015-Clerk.doc
Some questions:
#9: what is to "charge Social"?---Social Services?
the URL to the fbi has something wrong with it
I have fixed some of the things that were topic specific.
The believe this is the correct link for FBI info:
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/public-corruption-fbis-...
Thank you!
why cant i rejoin my civics course? cant even remmber were i was now, did they reset somthing ?
Brad Parsons has sent you a group email from National Liberty Alliance.
IMPORTANT NOTICE! As a Courtroom Observer, attending a matter for someone
else, DO NOT USE THE "YOU'RE FIRED!!" forms. Those forms
are for the use of the person whose hearing/trial you are attending. They
should ONLY use them once thoroughly familiar with the law, and how to
conduct themselves in a Common Law fashion.
Even with that knowledge, there will be those who are facing judges WHO
DON'T CARE and who WILL PUT THEM IN JAIL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT.
We don't want ANY Courtroom Observer Committee members to be
placed in jeopardy for ANY reason. That is not the purpose of Courtroom
Observers. Their purpose is to gather evidence of how the proceedings are
conducted and of violations of rights perpetrated by the courts and other
officials. If you are told that you cannot video tape a session, and to
turn off your video recorder, we urge you to comply, after telling the
person telling you to turn it off that they are violating your rights.
If you can keep the audio going without discovery, that's GREAT, but
don't risk getting locked up or physically injured. Take the best
notes you can.
AGAIN, unless it is your case, and you are willing to take the risk of
incarceration, DON'T FIRE THE JUDGE!!!
God bless you all for your work in this cause.
Brad
YOU are already targets!
Private Attorney General PJ Stewart
5:14 PM (28 minutes ago)
My Reply to one of my group.
Badge of HONOR! You are not doing it right till you totally infuriate those who are abusing you. They should ONLY use them once thoroughly familiar with the law, and how to conduct themselves in a Common Law fashion.
Even with that knowledge, there will be those who are facing judges WHO
DON'T CARE and who WILL PUT THEM IN JAIL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT.
We don't want ANY Courtroom Observer Committee members to be
placed in jeopardy for ANY reason. That is not the purpose of Courtroom
Observers. Their purpose is to gather evidence of how the proceedings are
conducted and of violations of rights perpetrated by the courts and other
officials. If you are told that you cannot video tape a session, and to
turn off your video recorder, we urge you to comply, after telling the
person telling you to turn it off that they are violating your rights.
If you can keep the audio going without discovery, that's GREAT, but
don't risk getting locked up or physically injured. Take the best
notes you can.
AGAIN, unless it is your case, and you are willing to take the risk of
incarceration, DON'T FIRE THE JUDGE!!!
God bless you all for your work in this cause.
Brad
YOU are already targets!
Private Attorney General PJ Stewart
5:14 PM (28 minutes ago)
My Reply to one of my group.
Badge of HONOR! You are not doing it right till you piss off the people who should be pissed off.
Fear mongering is not going to save peoples homes or help them in their cases.
The second you don't bend over and take it in the rear, is the moment you become a target. I only remove the target from your rear. You just can't convince people that once they are a target they'd better put up their dukes. These courts are only going to understand one thing, enough people have to FIRE our public servants till we are doing so beyond what they can ignore.
It is time, I am in Molokai teaching a man and his wife how to stand up to the tyranny. He was already a target and I am empowering, educating enlightening and enabling him to be free. Freedom is not free, it takes BRAVERY.
Brad has scared a lot of people and that is good, because they need to understand how much they will lose if they don't start standing up for their rights. He's also cutting out the one's who are not really ready to make a change for me. I am grateful for him doing that for me. Thank you Brad.
Fear mongering is not going to save people's homes or help them in their cases.
The second you don't bend over and take it in the rear is the moment you become a target. I only remove the target from your fanny. You just can't convince people that once they are a target they'd better put up their dukes. These courts are only going to understand one thing; when enough people have FIRED our public servants in such a manner that they can't ignore.
It is time. I am in Molokai teaching a man and his wife how to stand up to the tyranny. He was already a target and I am empowering, educating, enlightening and enabling him to be free. Freedom is not free; its success requires BRAVERY and the WILLINGNESS TO ACT!
Brad has scared a lot of people and that is good, they need to understand how much they will lose if they don't start standing up for their rights. He's also cutting out the one's who are not really ready to make a change for me. I am grateful for him doing that for me. Thank you Brad.
Thank you Brad, I believe that our objectives are to "Stay out of Jail", those people who want to go to jail are free to do so, however I myself would not volunteer. It seems to me that our goal is to get into the court, then proceed with our common law courts. It was disclosed on last week's call that some or maybe only one went to jail for contempt of court.
PJ is a powerful personality. Yes, it appears to work. How long? I cannot advise you to do it! Do you understand my wording?
Didn't PJ already openly 'fire' and impeached a bunch of public servants and yet she's not in jail? She must be doing something right, yes?
How about if the Judge holds you in contempt of court, you say:
>Is that Civil Contempt or Criminal Contempt?
If Judge says Civil Contempt
>Where is the contract between you and i?
If Judge says Criminal Contempt
>Where is the injured party?
Any thoughts or comments to this response?