KEEP AND BEAR ARMS ...

1 post / 0 new
Infamous Keny
Infamous Keny's picture
KEEP AND BEAR ARMS ...

Here's how to address the isue IN ADVANCE!
 
We the People ...”, ex rel
 
Kenneth-Wayne: Leaming
 
SUI JURIS, CLAIMANT
 
c/o 13021  42 Ave S
 
Auburn
 
Washington
 
 
 
CLAIMANT(s)
 
September 21, 2020
 
 
 
aka: Jay Inslee, FIDUCIARY
 
c/o Office of Governor, Successors & Assigns
 
Capitol Campus
 
Olympia
 
Washington
 
 
 
aka: Bob Ferguson, FIDUCIARY
 
c/o Office of Attorney General, Successors & Assigns
 
1125 Washington Street SE
 
Olympia
 
Washington
 
 
 
aka: Dan Satterberg, FIDUCIARY,
 
King County Prosecuting Attorney, Successors & Assigns
 
c/o 516 Third Avenue, W400 Seattle
 
Washington
 
 
 
RESPONDENT(s)
 
RE-AFFIRMATION OF ACCEPTANCE
 
OF OATH /CONTRACT(s) AND SURETY(S)
 
and
 
CLAIM(S) ON SURETY(S) UPON BREACH
 
(FAILURE TO PROPERLY TRAIN AND SUPERVISE POLICE, etc.)
 
State of Creation )
 
) SS.
 
House of Leaming )
 
          Kenneth-Wayne, herein CLAIMANT, being subject to penalty for bearing false witness, under the law of Jehovah-Elohim, [E.R. 603] affirms CLAIMANT is of age of majority, competent to testify, and having firsthand knowledge, STATES AND DECLARES:
 

  1. CLAIMANT comes in good faith, peace and honor, and for curing any defects along the way; and,
  2. CLAIMANT hereby re-affirms acceptance the Oath of Office Contract and surety(s) of the addressee /RESPONDENT(s) Identified above, fiduciary of the office(s) of GOVERNOR and ATTORNEY GENERAL (“State of Washington”, 23 Dec. 1889 (previously ACCEPTED on behalf of CLAIMANT by Kenneth-Wayne: Leaming), and Acceptance, of King county Prosecuting Attorney, and OFFICER(S)/ Employee(s) on Duty and Participating from time to time in the Act(s) and /or Omission(s) as set forth further herein, herein RESPONDENT(s); and,
  3. The ACCEPTANCE(s) is/are applicable as to CLAIMANT, and others similarly situated (Constituents to “We the People ...”), relating to said fiduciary(s) as RESPONDENT(s); and,
  4. CLAIMANT is a Constituent to The State of Washington, AD 1878, admitted to the union upon the Constitution appearing as Senate Document 66, during February, 1889, and as such is a Constituent member to "We the People ..", and is NOT a subject to the municipal corporation whose process name is "State of Washington" created by the Territorial Legislature on 23 December, 1889, and said "State of Washington" assumed fiduciary responsibility for The State of Washington (supra) during the transition to the 1878 Washington Republic, which, to date, has not occurred, and others similarly situated and,
  5. CLAIMANT relies in Good Faith on the FACT that those who left a record of Due Process law and procedure over the centuries did NOT commit fraud in leaving a record of Matthew 18:15-18, Magna Charta of 15 June 1215, Declaration of Interdependence of 04 July 1776, Federalist Papers of October 1787 – August 1788, Constitution for the union of the several united States of America of 1789 – 1791 (union Constitution); and the Congressional enactment of the ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT(s) of 11 June 1946, Pub. L. 79-404/ 60 Stat. 237 as amended: and recognized by the “State of Washington” (supra) legislature through enactment of 1988  c 4 as amended, inclusive of the provision setting forth that Review of the Administrative Record (Judicial. Etc.) is limited to the FACT(s) appearing in the Administrative Record; and,
  6. CLAIMANT (and other similarly situated have) had CLAIMANT’s liberty restrained through, at least, August, 2020, resulting in consequential taking of CLAIMANT’s, and others similarly situated LIBERTY, by party(s) who routinely, as a Pattern and Practice, under THREAT of Kidnapping, being SHOT to DEATH, unwarranted taking of property and subjected to use of physical force (injuries) under color of “State of Washington” Law, EXTORT “fees” for “Concealed Weapons Permit” and, considering that Article II in Amendment to the union Constitution does NOT provide for ANY EXCEPTIONS, whether the Arms are concealed or not, whether under a fictitious name, or otherwise, RESPONDENT(s), and colleagues, have created a RECORD of offense(s) and applied to a Constituent under color of “State of Washington” law, and as such subject to the training, supervision, control, and policies of the above captioned RESPONDENT(s); and, “

 
7.CLAIMANT is aware that Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines:
 
ARMS. Any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at, or strike at another. Co. Litt. 161 b, 162 a; Crompt. Just. P. 65; Cunn. Dict. h. t. BOUVIER’S LAW DICTIONARY 1856 Page 200 of 1826
 
2. The Constitution of the United States, Amendm. art. 2, declares, "that a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In Kentucky, a statute "to prevent persons from wearing concealed arms," has been declared to be unconstitutional; 2 Litt. R. 90; … and,
 

  1. CLAIMANT is aware that Article II in Amendment to the union Constitution reads in full:

 
A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
 

  1. CLAIMANT is aware of the FACT that Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines MILITIA as:

 
MILITIA. The military force of the nation, consisting of citizens called forth to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection and repel invasion.
 
2. The Constitution of the United States provides on this subject as follows: Art. 1, s. 8, 14. Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.
 
 
 

  1. CLAIMANT is aware that the one supreme Court of the union of the several united States of America has repeatedly set forth that IF EVERY ELEMENT OF JURISDICTION DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE RECORD (of an act /action), THERE IS NO JURISDICTION and CLAIMANT cannot find in any of the ACT(s) of “State of Washington” legislative body(s) any delegation of constitutional JURISDICTION to LIMIT or make EXCEPTION to the RIGHT(s) to KEEP and BEAR ARMS; and,
  2. CLAIMANT is aware that the United States Government Printing Office STYLE MANUAL Expressly sets forth that an ALL UPPERCASE NAME (as appears upon CCW) is the name of a Vessel, Corporation, Other Artificial Entity, or Decedent, and NOT a living, Breathing Human Being which CLAIMANT and others similarly situated, is /are, which RESPONDENT(s) routinely use THREATS of Arrest, capture and/ or being SHOT and KILLED and Pleadings /Process to EXTORT fees (supra) IN CONCERT OR CONSPIRACY under COLOR OF LAW while using a FICTITIOUS NAME as to CLAIMANT, and others similarly situated; and,
  3. CLAIMANT is aware that the following acts/omissions/actions have been CRIMINALIZED by Congress and /or  “State of Washington” (supra) legislature and with specific penalty(s) as incorporated by reference in the RESPONDENT(s) Oath of Office CONTRACT(s)

 
1.   “State of Washington” officer(s), Agent(s) and/or employee(s) did engage in EXTORTION by, being an officer, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof (“State of Washington”, 1889 (supra)), or representing themselves to be or assuming to act as such, under color or pretense of law, office or employment committed an act of extortion, often while displaying FIREARMS (guns for hire), by demanding Constituent(s) perform the action of writing on a form(s) (CCW Permit Application) as if “signing” instrument(s); and,
 
2.   The repeated Act(s) /Action(s) of attacking Constituent members to “We the People ...” while carrying FIREARMS, Capturing said Constituents and subjecting them to involuntary servitude of PERFORMING in simulated, CORPORATE, “courts” and the taking of liberty and property thereon for exercising the Constitutionally Protected and Recognized RIGHT to KEEP and BEAR ARMS, “State of Washington” and subdivisions’, officer(s), Agent(s) and/or employee(s) have engaged in ACTS OF WAR against the union of the several united States of America, comprised of its constituents, and in breach of Oath of Office CONTRACTS and subject to the penalties set forth in said CONTRACTS, inclusive of REBELLION  OR INSURRECTION, Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808 ; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147 [18 USC 2383], MISPRISION OF TREASON, Act of (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807 ; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147 [18 USC 2382] and TREASON, Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807 ; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148 [18 USC 2381] and inclusive of ALL Obligations and Penalty(s) thereof;
 
11.        The penalty(s) are due and payable by the Surety(s), Pub. L. 97-258 as amended, securing the performance of the Oath-CONTRACT (supra) unless the respondent and/or Surety(s) respond within thirty (30) days of SERVICE of the instant Claim(s) process with responsive process inclusive of actual EVIDENCE in controversy to the Evidence set forth in the Claim(s) (supra); in the alternative CLAIMANT will accept the nihil-decit /tacit-procuration (default) affirmation of the fact(s) and obligations set forth in the Claims (supra) as the FINAL Agency Action of RESPONDENT(s) and their agency(s); and,
 
12.        In the event the FACT(s) as Evidenced hereinabove are NOT controverted by FACT EVIDENCE, Pub. L. 93-595 as amended, the sums set forth by law and incorporated in Oath/CONTRACT become Payable and Due to the Treasury of the union of the several united States of America consistent with Article I, § 10 of the union Constitution and as purviewed through Article(s) 9 and 10 in Amendment thereto; and,
 
13.        The RESPONDENT(s) shall, upon such default, have a duty to forthwith take action to Prevent /Correct the pattern and practice by “State of Washington” (supra) Policy Enforcement (POLICE) officials and other Washington General Jurisdiction, and limited /special Jurisdiction, Peace Officers from INFRINGING upon any Party(s) RIGHT to KEEP and BEAR ARMS as mandated by the terms and conditions of each RESPONDENT(s)’ Oath of Office CONTRACT incorporating by reference the Law, inclusive of CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS and DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, the Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696 ; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, §103(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75 ; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7018(a), (b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396 ; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, §60006(a), title XXXII, §§320103(a), 320201(a), title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970 , 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§604(b)(14)(A), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507 , 3511 [18 USC 241 & 242] and as purviewed through CIVIL ACTION FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS R.S. §1979; Pub. L. 96–170, §1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284 ; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, §309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853 [42 USC 1983], CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH RIGHTS, R.S. §1980 derived from acts July 31, 1861, ch. 33, 12 Stat. 284 ; Apr. 20, 1871, ch. 22, §2, 17 Stat. 13, FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT, R.S. §1981 [42 USC 1986], AND FURTHER, RESPONDENT(s) have an Oath /CONTRACT DUTY to investigate and take appropriate action relating to the Offenses, /BREACH OF OATH /CONTRACT(s) by the “State of Washington” officer(s), Agent(s) and/or employee(s) that have, to date, participated in the above described CRIMES; and,
 
14.        All rights reserved.