Tutorial on initiating/answering court cases

I was wondering this myself. Because I've recently been captured and detained against my will. I go to trial in September and was needing to know exactly what papers and file...

Hi heather contact the IRT commmitte on this one please>. what kind of case do they claim to have against you?a Victimless crime?

You must be a real tiger Heather...

Something like that gary

Summary of ‘How to conduct yourself in Court’ video
1. Arraignment – charges will be presented to you and Judge will try to get you to plea, which you must not. You respond to the Judge that you don’t understand the charges against you and need some questions answered
2. Establish jurisdiction - first, whether charges are Civil or Criminal.
3. If the Judge says Civil – and there’s no injured party, motion for dismissal for lack of a sworn complaint by an injured party
4. If the Judge says Criminal, ascertain whether Common Law Court or Admiralty or Military Tribunal Venue, citing Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution.
5. In the unlikelihood that the Judge says Common Law and there’s no injured party, you can motion for a dismissal. If he says the injured party is the State of Arizona, you ask for dismissal based on being in the wrong court
6. If the Judge says Admiralty – you point out that he has no jurisdiction without also having a valid international contract in dispute. Since he doesn’t, you motion for dismissal
7. If Judge ignores your questions and enters a plea for you – you object, pointing out that he is practicing law from the bench and motion for a plea withdrawal and Case dismissal.
8. If the judge gives you a continuance and demands you get an Attorney, you state that you do not need legal advice, but instead seek legal intent, so that you can intelligently defend yourself, pointing out that there is an enormous difference between the rules of the two Courts If he persists, point out that the Court has failed in its’ duty to inform you of the nature and cause of the action and that the court intends to bring this action against you under a secret jurisdiction known only to them.
9. If the Judge threatens contempt, tell him you are just trying to exercise your 6th amendment right that he disclose the nature and cause of the charges against you, and that you can provide court citations that show that when you exercise a constitutional right, it cannot be converted into a crime and that they need to establish jurisdiction or dismiss the case.
10. If the judge then tries to claim that this is a statutory jurisdiction under the statues of AZ. you say that you have never heard of a criminal action under a statutory jurisdiction and no such jurisdiction is in the Constitution. Ask him where you can find the published rules of Criminal procedure since it is imperative you have them to defend yourself, knowing of course that they don’t exist.
11. If you don’t get a dismissal, ask for a motions hearing where you cannot be found guilty, but the case can be dismissed.
This is a copy of How to Conduct yourself in court. I believe I got it from NLA last year

HOW TO CONDUCT YOURSELF IN COURT Part 1

Hello and welcome to the stop the cop audio training. We're going to show you how to enforce a right to a fair hearing and to win your ticket in the process to make this plan work for you. You must listen and speak out loud to cement it in your brain in turn so it becomes crystal clear in your own mind and you will be prepared for any response. You must be clear enough that you don't have to stop and think but must always be in control of this plan.

The first appearance you make in court is your arraignment in which the purposes is for the court to present the charges and find out how you intend to react, by standing up for your rights or being fearful and an easy target. During this proceeding the judge will inform you of the charges against you in an attempt to get you to enter a plea of guilty, or not guilty. If their choice is ‘no contest’ which is essentially pleading ‘guilty’ without admitting guilt, be careful however because as soon as you open your mouth to enter a plea, you have given them formal jurisdiction over you. If you intend to follow our procedure and win, you must not enter a plea. the judge’s first question to you should be something to the effect “do you understand the charges against you” or it might be “how do you intend to plea”

You must say no you do not understand or you cannot enter a plea until you get some questions answered. The judge will probably be irritated and try to intimidate you. You must politely state that you need to have some questions answered before you can enter your plea. Tell him that you do not understand the nature and causes of the action against you. Once a judge has agreed to answer your questions, your first question will be

Is this going to be a civil action or a criminal action? In the highly unlikely chance that the judge answered your question by saying it is a civil action your response will be

Thank you your honor, let the record reflect that this is a civil action. Your honor, since this is a civil action, I make a motion to dismiss for lack of a sworn complaint by an injured party, and no injured party is present. More likely the judge has stated that this is a criminal action so you respond

Thank you your honor, let the record for this court then show that this action against me is a criminal action. Now I have another question. Your honor. The Constitution grants this court two different criminal jurisdictions, one is a criminal jurisdiction under the common law and the other is a criminal jurisdiction under Admiralty or military tribunal venue from Article one Section 8 clause 17 the Constitution. In which of these two criminal jurisdictions does this Court intend to try me? Don't panic if you don't get the article section in Clause, you’ll have them down by the time you have practiced, but if you are afraid of getting it wrong, it would be wise to have some brief notes with that clause number in it. If the judge gives a specific answer you again say

Thank you your honor, let the record of this court then show that this action against me is a criminal action under (whichever jurisdiction he replied). However don't expect an easy answer to that question as you've just exposed the court’s fraud. The truth is, they’re acting under a Military Tribunal which they have no right to use with you, but the judge can’t say that and he can’t say common law because if he does you make a motion to have the case dismissed because there's no sworn complaint by an injured-party and no injured party present, exactly like he did if he said it was a civil action, when you protested that there's no injured party, if the judge is silly enough to say that the state (whatever state you're in) is the injured party then say

Your honor I make a motion that this case be dismissed, we are in the wrong court. If the state is a party to the case, they cannot also be the judge and prosecutors. This case needs to be transferred to federal court or be dismissed.

More likely the judge will try to avoid answering and will tell you to get a licensed attorney for such legal advice. The response will be

Thank you your honor but I don't think you'd be violating your oath of office if you did your duty under the Constitution, you see I am NOT seeking legal advice. What I want to know is legal intent. I have the right to appear as myself in my own person without a licensed attorney and in order to intelligently defend myself, I have to know the jurisdiction that this court is operating under, because the Rules of Criminal Procedure under a common law jurisdiction are very different from the Rules of Criminal Procedure under an Admiralty or military tribunal. I need to know under which jurisdiction you intend to try me in order for me to proceed with this case. The sixth amendment grants me the right to know the jurisdiction being applied, and grants you the duty to inform me, and I don't think you'd be violating your oath of office for doing your duty, therefore will you please answer the question so this Court is properly identified. If the judge still response by telling you to get an attorney your answer will be

Thank you your honor, let the record of this court then show that I ( your name here) the accused in this criminal action has asked the court to divulge the nature and cause of the accusation upon the authority of the sixth amendment, and that this Court has failed in its duty to inform me of the nature and cause of the action. Furthermore, let the record also show that this court intends to bring this action against me, under a secret jurisdiction, known only to licensed attorneys. At this point, the judge might claim that this is a statutory jurisdiction under the statutes and the state of Arizona. If he does so, your next statement Is

Thank you your honor, let the record for this court then show that it intends to conduct a criminal action against me under a statutory jurisdiction, but your honor that raises another question, I've never heard of such a thing as a criminal action under statutory jurisdiction and there's no such jurisdiction established in the Constitution. I would be happy to accept this your honor if you could please tell me where I can find the published Rules of Criminal Procedure under a statutory jurisdiction and where this nature cause and jurisdiction information exists? It is imperative that I have a published rules of procedure, so that I may conduct a fair defense in a fair trial.

Now keep in mind the judge made up this jurisdiction. There is no grand authority for statutory jurisdiction and no published rules, but don't expect him to tell you that. He must either lie, dismiss a case, or unlawfully enter a plea on your behalf. In rare cases he might even threaten you with contempt of court. If he threatens contempt say

Your honor, I do not wish to be held in contempt. I am simply trying to exercise my sixth amendment right that you disclose the nature and cause of the charges against me. I can provide court citations that show that the exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. Please either identify the properly establish jurisdiction or I make a motion that you dismiss the case against me.

Also, unlikely but still possible, is that the judge will tell the truth when you ask under which criminal jurisdiction you were being tried and will tell you that it is an admiralty jurisdiction. If this happens you would respond

Thank you your honor, let the record for this court then show, that this Court intends to proceed with a criminal action against me (your name here) as a condition of contract under an admiralty jurisdiction as a military tribunal. Under Article one Section 8 clause 17 however your honor, you must realize that you have no such jurisdiction without also having a valid international contract in dispute. I am not aware of having entered into any international contracts, so I deny that any such contract exists. Will you please instruct the prosecuting attorney to inform this Court if there is such a contract, and if so, to place it into evidence and explain how I am party to it and I'm compelled to perform under it. If the prosecution cannot do so your honor, I make a motion this case against me be dismissed.

Of course, if at any time your case is dismissed, make your pronouncement

Thank you your honor, let the record at this Court reflect that case number (blah blah blah) against (your name here) has been dismissed. Now leave quietly, save your gloating for outside the courtroom and if at any time you sense a good opportunity to make a motion for dismissal, make it, even if it wasn't part of your prepared script. You need to be flexible and jump on in need opportunities that are presented to you. Let's say that the judge has had enough of your questions and decides to help you out by entering a plea of not guilty on your behalf: Immediately object

Your honor I object, for you to enter a plea on my behalf is practicing law from the bench because entering a plea is my job or my attorney's job. Has a court made a judicial determination that I am NOT GUILTY

Now you really trapped him, for him to say ‘yes’ he has admitted that you are not guilty. At this point, state

Thank you your honor, let the record of this Court reflect that the judge has made a judicial determination, and that I am NOT GUILTY of the charges against me. Therefore I make a motion that this case be dismissed because a judge has determined that I am NOT GUILTY

If he says no he has not made a judicial determination, make a motion that the plea be withdrawn and you be allowed to enter your own plea once you know the nature and cause of the case pending against you. If the judge enters a plea of no contest object saying

Your honor I object. For you to enter a plea on my behalf, is practicing law from the bench, because entering a plea is my or my attorney's job. I make a motion that the plea be withdrawn. For you to make a judicial determination that I am entering a plea of ‘no contest’ would be resolved in the courts treating me as though I had pled guilty. The court is trying to constrain me to an unfair plea choice, in the absence of my understanding the nature and cause of the charges against me.

Or let's say that the judge instead gives you a continuance and demands that you obtain a licensed attorney. Ask- has a court may be judicial determination to deny me the right to defend myself in my own person and to force me into hiring a licensed attorney that will conspire with the court to try me under a secret jurisdiction known only to the judge and the licensed attorney
Apparently I visited a Stop the Cop seminar or website. They are the author of this article

Please excuse my insufficient understanding. My Constitution, in Article I, Section 8, clause 17, talks about the powers of the legislative branch. Am I reading this wrong, or did I miscount my paragraphs? Could you explain how Article I, Section 8, clause 17 applies to my conduct in court in enough detail I might understand? Thank You in advance!

Above information is very good.
Always remember that in civil there needs to be a contract, an agreement you signed knowingly, willingly and voluntarily. It must contain 2 wet ink signatures to be a valid contract. They never have a second signature only yours. However, if you were not apprised of and agreed to all the terms and conditions of the contract it is a unconscionable contract with no force and affect against you. Thus, there is no breach of contract.
Statutory refers to statutes that are copyrighted and private law and do not apply to the people only agents. We cannot use them and they cannot use them against us unless we breach the peace or are a safety risk to others. You could ask judge how they apply to you when you are not agent or servant or describe who you damaged and how.
Sometimes a judge will claim they are using quasi jurisdiction. As mentioned above, there is no such thing so again ask them where the rules and procedure are outlined for your use.
Never say you understand anything when they ask you. You always over stand them. There is no way to understand a double minded person. Use reason, logic and common sense, stay cool, be respectful do not be arrogant. With some knowledge you can trap them into the pit that they have created for you. Make them violate your due process and once they do that it does not matter if you win at the lower level (it's a good thing if you do) because now you have the ticket you need to claim your money damages against them. After all they get paid to violate you so it's fair game now to get paid as victim and witness. If you are not having fun you are are not doing it right.

Do Not Talk to the Police
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
5.5 million views
Preliminary way to protect yourself.